Fitusiran prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A or B who switched from prior BPA/CFC prophylaxis (ATLAS-PPX).

Fitusiran, a subcutaneous (SC) investigational siRNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin to rebalance hemostasis in people with hemophilia A or B (PwHA/B), irrespective of inhibitor status. This Phase 3, open-label study (NCT03549871) evaluated the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in males aged ≥ 12 years with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors, who received prior bypassing agent (BPA)/clotting factor concentrate (CFC) prophylaxis. Participants continued their prior BPA/CFC prophylaxis for 6 months before switching to once-monthly 80 mg fitusiran prophylaxis for 7 months (onset and efficacy periods). Primary endpoint was annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the BPA/CFC prophylaxis and fitusiran efficacy period. Secondary endpoints included spontaneous ABR (AsBR) and joint ABR (AjBR). Safety and tolerability were assessed. Of 80 enrolled participants, 65 (inhibitor/non-inhibitor, n = 19/46) were eligible for ABR analyses. Observed median (IQR) ABRs were 6.5 (2.2, 19.6)/4.4 (2.2, 8.7) with BPA/CFC prophylaxis versus 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)/0.0 (0.0, 2.7) in the corresponding fitusiran efficacy period. Estimated mean ABRs were substantially reduced with fitusiran by 79.7% (P = 0.0021) and 46.4% (P = 0.0598) versus BPA/CFC prophylaxis, respectively. Forty-one participants (63.1%) experienced zero treated bleeds with fitusiran versus 11 (16.9%) with BPAs/CFCs. Median AsBR and AjBR were both 2.2 with BPA/CFC prophylaxis and 0.0 in the fitusiran efficacy period. Two participants (3.0%) experienced suspected or confirmed thromboembolic events with fitusiran. Once-monthly fitusiran prophylaxis significantly reduced bleeding events versus BPA/CFC prophylaxis in PwHA/B, with or without inhibitors and reported adverse events were generally consistent with previously identified risks of fitusiran.

Pharmacokinetics and coagulation biomarkers in children and adults with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis every 1, 2, or 4 weeks.

Background: Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that bridges activated factor (F)IX and FX, mimicking the function of missing activated FVIII and thus improving hemostasis in people with hemophilia A. The efficacy and safety of emicizumab were demonstrated in 4 phase III clinical trials (HAVEN 1-4). Objectives: Here, we describe pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and exploratory safety biomarkers in HAVEN 1 to 4. Methods: Participants received emicizumab at a loading dose of 3 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. PKs, PDs, and safety biomarkers were assessed in samples collected at regular intervals during the trials. Results: Emicizumab plasma trough concentrations increased during the loading dose period, reaching a mean of 52.9 µg/mL (SD, 13.6 µg/mL) at week 5, and were sustained at 42.1 to 52.3 µg/mL thereafter with maintenance dosing. Activated partial thromboplastin time shortened following the first emicizumab dose. Mean FVIII-like activity and thrombin generation peak height increased to 25.2 IU/dL (SD, 6.9 IU/dL) and 115.2 nM (SD, 42.5 nM) at week 5, with levels sustained at 17 to 23 IU/dL and >116 nM thereafter, respectively. Emicizumab did not notably affect FIX or FX plasma antigen levels, prothrombin time, or concentrations of exploratory safety markers of coagulation activation (D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and fibrinogen). Conclusion: In HAVEN 1 to 4, emicizumab demonstrated sustained PKs and PDs and improved coagulation parameters without affecting safety biomarkers.

How I treat pediatric venous thromboembolism in the DOAC era.

ABSTRACT: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) rivaroxaban and dabigatran are newly licensed for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children and mark a renaissance in pediatric anticoagulation management. They provide a convenient option over standard-of-care anticoagulants (heparins, fondaparinux, and vitamin K antagonists) because of their oral route of administration, child-friendly formulations, and significant reduction in monitoring. However, limitations related to therapeutic monitoring when needed and the lack of approved reversal agents for DOACs in children raise some safety concerns. There is accumulating experience of safety and efficacy of DOACs in adults for a broad scope of indications; however, the cumulative experience of using DOACs in pediatrics, specifically for those with coexisting chronic illnesses, is sparse. Consequently, clinicians must often rely on their experience for treating VTE and extrapolate from data in adults while using DOACs in children. In this article, the authors share their experience of managing 4 scenarios that hematologists are likely to encounter in their day-to-day practice. Topics addressed include (1) appropriateness of indication; (2) use for special populations of children; (3) considerations for laboratory monitoring; (4) transition between anticoagulants; (5) major drug interactions; (6) perioperative management; and (7) anticoagulation reversal.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in infants with hemophilia A (HAVEN 7): primary analysis of a phase 3b open-label trial.

ABSTRACT: Subcutaneous emicizumab enables prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A (HA) from birth, potentially reducing risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). HAVEN 7 (NCT04431726) is the first clinical trial of emicizumab dedicated to infants, designed to investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of emicizumab in those aged ≤12 months with severe HA without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. Participants in this phase 3b trial received emicizumab 3 mg/kg maintenance dose every 2 weeks for 52 weeks and are continuing emicizumab during the 7-year long-term follow-up. Efficacy end points included annualized bleed rate (ABR): treated, all, treated spontaneous, and treated joint bleeds. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), thromboembolic events (TEs), thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), and immunogenicity (anti-emicizumab antibodies [ADAs] and FVIII inhibitors). At primary analysis, 55 male participants had received emicizumab (median treatment duration: 100.3; range, 52-118 weeks). Median age at informed consent was 4.0 months (range, 9 days to 11 months 30 days). Model-based ABR for treated bleeds was 0.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.63), with 54.5% of participants (n = 30) having zero treated bleeds. No ICH occurred. All 42 treated bleeds in 25 participants (45.5%) were traumatic. Nine participants (16.4%) had ≥1 emicizumab-related AE (all grade 1 injection-site reactions). No AE led to treatment changes. No deaths, TEs, or TMAs occurred. No participant tested positive for ADAs. Two participants were confirmed positive for FVIII inhibitors. This primary analysis of HAVEN 7 indicates that emicizumab is efficacious and well tolerated in infants with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors.

Prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc in hemophilia A: long-term follow-up on joint health, efficacy, and safety from phase 3 studies in children and adults.

Background: Recurrent joint bleeds are a major cause of morbidity in severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, [rFVIIIFc]) has demonstrated benefits beyond bleed control, including joint health maintenance. Objectives: To assess long-term efficacy and safety of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE) studies. Methods: Longitudinal analysis included pooled data from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE. Subgroup analyses investigated outcomes in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score and target joints in subjects with 4 to 5 years follow-up on individualized prophylaxis (IP), and those with the highest annualized bleeding rate (ABR) quartile during Year 1 of IP. Results: Overall, rFVIIIFc consumption remained stable and low ABRs were maintained, with a median treatment duration of 4.2/3.4 years in subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, respectively. Median overall ABR also remained low (1.0-2.0) in subjects on IP for 4 to 5 years. Sustained improvements in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score were demonstrated over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. In subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, 99.6% (n = 234)/100% (n = 9) of evaluable baseline target joints were resolved, with no recurrence in 95%/100% of target joints. In IP subjects within the highest ABR quartile in Year 1, continued improvements were observed over a median follow-up of 4.3 years in ABR and joint health, without increased factor consumption. No inhibitors or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Previously treated subjects of all ages receiving long-term prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc had sustained clinical benefits, including improved joint health and low ABR.

Neutralizing antidrug antibody to emicizumab in patients with severe hemophilia A: Case report of a first noninhibitor patient and review of the literature.

Background: Hemophilia A (HA) is a genetic bleeding disorder characterized by the deficiency of the coagulation protein factor (F) VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to factor concentrates (inhibitors) created an unmet need for novel therapies. The first agent to address this need is emicizumab. Key Clinical Question: Can emicizumab ADA occur in patients with HA without FVIII inhibitors? Clinical Approach: A new case (the first in a noninhibitor patient) presented with unexpected and excessive bleeding and a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. The patient was evaluated by assessing FVIII levels, and the previously published modified version of the Bethesda assay was used to determine the level of ADA to emicizumab. Conclusion: Although emicizumab is very effective and has minimal immunogenicity, ADAs, albeit rare, can still occur. There have been 4 previously published anti-emicizumab ADA cases with severe HA with inhibitors, and herein, we describe 1 new case with severe HA without inhibitors.

Delivery of gene therapy in haemophilia treatment centres in the United States: Practical aspects of preparedness and implementation.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) and healthcare providers (HCPs) will need to adapt to a new treatment paradigm with the emergence of adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy for the treatment of haemophilia in adults. AIM: This review examines the upcoming patient and institutional journeys, along with practical aspects of preparedness for clinical delivery of gene therapy by HTCs. METHODS: Based on our clinical experience and examination of published literature, we explored the parallel journeys for patients and treatment centres to navigate before, during, and after administration of gene therapy. RESULTS: The patient journey includes: information gathering; decision making; comprehensive patient assessment; preparation for the infusion itself; short- and long-term monitoring; lifestyle modifications; and the possible need for immunosuppressive treatment. Informed decision-making may require patient education with extensive discussions and an understanding that not all people with haemophilia will choose or be eligible for gene therapy, although eligibility criteria continue to evolve. The institutional journey includes: consideration of biosafety procedures; planning for product procurement, handling, storage, and administration; development of detailed protocols and guidance documents; contingency planning for immunosuppressive and haemostatic management; consideration of clinical capabilities and staff training needs; coordination of efforts by the full multidisciplinary team; and collaboration between referring, dosing, and follow-up treatment centres. Documented protocols and guidance documents are pivotal for this complex therapy to ensure safe handling, optimal delivery, and post-infusion management and follow-up. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of this new treatment modality will require communication and collaboration among multiple stakeholders.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of eptacog beta (coagulation factor VIIa [recombinant]-jncw) for the treatment of hemophilia A and B with inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Bypassing agents (BPAs) are used to treat acute bleeding episodes, manage bleeding during perioperative care, and prophylactically minimize bleed occurrence in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors (PwHABI). However, the effectiveness of BPAs that have been prescribed for the last several decades can be variable, motivating the development of a new recombinant activated factor VII, eptacog beta. AREAS COVERED: This review covers key eptacog beta findings from phase 1b and phase 3 (PERSEPT) clinical trials, which formed the basis for its regulatory approval to treat PwHABI ages 12 and older. Descriptions of eptacog beta structure and glycosylation profile, mechanism of action, preclinical study results, and cost analyses are also presented. EXPERT OPINION: PwHABI have had only two options for bleed treatment for the past several decades. With its distinct glycosylation profile, eptacog beta offers a novel therapy aiming to improve upon BPAs currently in use, providing an option with more than one dosing regimen and a rapid response that allows most bleeds to be treated with just one dose. This has become particularly important given the use of subcutaneous medications (e.g., emicizumab) for prophylaxis of bleeding. Clinicians should consider eptacog beta as a BPA for all PwHABI.

The immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of N8-GP in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: pathfinder6 end-of-trial results.

BACKGROUND: The pathfinder6 (NCT02137850) international phase 3 trial examined immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of the extended half-life factor VIII (FVIII) replacement product N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol; Esperoct) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: We present end-of trial results for extended PUP N8-GP treatment for up to a median (range) 2.5 (0.0; 7.4) years. PATIENTS/METHODS: Longer-term N8-GP treatment in PUPs with hemophilia A was examined. The prophylaxis regimen was ∼60 IU/kg N8-GP i.v. twice weekly, or every 3 or 7 days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FVIII inhibitors. RESULTS: Overall, 81 patients received N8-GP and were included in this analysis. The inhibitor incidence was 30.0% (15.7% high-titer [>5 BU]) for the extension phase. Patients had a median (range) 2.9 (0.1; 7.2) years of prophylaxis following the pre-prophylaxis period. During prophylaxis, the median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) (interquartile range) was 1.4 (0.6; 3.5), 13% of patients experienced no bleeding episodes, and 55.1% of patients experienced no spontaneous bleeds. The proportion of patients without any spontaneous bleeding episodes increased after the first year of prophylaxis. The hemostatic success rate in the treatment of bleeding episodes was 87.6%. No additional safety concerns were observed in patients with previously reported observation of temporarily decreased incremental recovery (IR). CONCLUSION: Long-term end-of-trial PUP N8-GP prophylaxis data indicate that PUPs respond well to long-term N8-GP treatment. The inhibitor incidence was consistent with previous results. Median ABR during prophylaxis was 1.4. There were no lasting clinical impacts or safety concerns for patients with an observation of temporarily decreased IR.

Effects of PK-guided prophylaxis on clinical outcomes and FVIII consumption for patients with moderate to severe Haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been increased focus on individualizing treatment for persons with hemophilia including pharmacokinetic-guided (PK) dosing. AIMS: In this retrospective study clinical outcomes before and after PK-guided prophylaxis were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight Haemophilia Treatment Centres from the United States participated in the study and included 132 patients classified into two cohorts: those undergoing a PK-assessment for product switch (switchers) or to optimize treatment (non-switchers). Subset analyses for the two most common products and patients with dosing per prescription label were included for annual bleeding rates (ABR), mean weekly consumption outcomes, and annualized cost of prophylaxis. RESULTS: The most common products before and after index date were octocog alfa, rurioctocog alfa pegol, and efmoroctocog alfa. Seventy-four (56%) patients were identified as switchers and 58 (44%) patients were classified as non-switchers. The majority of patients (78.0%) experienced either a decrease in ABR post-index or maintained 0 ABR during pre- and post-index time periods, with similar proportions identified in both switchers (77.0%) and non-switchers (79.3%) populations. Non-switchers were identified as having no significant change in cost of therapy, while switchers experienced increased cost of therapy driven by higher price of extended half-life products. Within subset analyses, patients receiving rurioctocog alfa pegol and efmoroctocog alfa had mean ABR under 1 after index date. CONCLUSION: PK-guided prophylaxis has the potential to improve clinical outcomes without increase in cost of therapy for patients maintaining product and can aid in maintaining effective protection against bleeds in those switching product.

Antithrombin lowering in hemophilia: a closer look at fitusiran.

Thrombin is a key enzyme in the maintenance of normal hemostatic function and is the central product of an interconnected set of simultaneously occurring cellular and proteolytic events. Antithrombin (AT) is a natural anticoagulant that downregulates different components of the clotting process, particularly thrombin generation. In good health, well-regulated hemostasis is the result of a balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant elements. Cumulative understanding of the regulation of thrombin generation and its central role in hemostasis and bleeding disorders has led to the clinical development of therapeutic strategies that aim to rebalance hemostasis in individuals with hemophilia and other coagulation factor deficiencies to improve bleeding phenotype. The aim of this review is to discuss the rationale for AT lowering in individuals with hemophilia, with a focus on fitusiran, its mechanism of action, and its potential as a prophylactic therapy for individuals with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. Fitusiran is an investigational small, interfering RNA therapeutic that targets and lowers AT. It is currently in phase III clinical trials and results have shown its potential to increase thrombin generation, leading to enhanced hemostasis and improved quality of life while reducing the overall treatment burden.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology recommendations for laboratory measurement of factor VIII and FIX type I inhibitors.

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Hematology. The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations on the measurement of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors. After an introduction on the clinical background and relevance of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitor testing, the following aspects of laboratory testing are included: screening for inhibitors, assay principle, sample requirements, testing requirements and interpretation, quality assurance, interferences and recent developments. This guidance document focusses on recommendations for a standardised procedure for the laboratory measurement of FVIII and FIX type I inhibitors. The recommendations are based on published data in peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion.

Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk factors reveals subtype heterogenicity in children with central venous catheters: a multicenter study from the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis consortium.

BACKGROUND: Acutely ill and medically complex children frequently rely on central venous catheters (CVCs) to provide life-sustaining treatment. Unfortunately, catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a serious and common complication. Little is known why some with a CVC develop CRT and others develop venous thromboembolism unrelated to the CVC (non-CRT). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with CRT in children with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE). METHODS: This case-case study included participants in the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis Registry with HA-VTE and CVC aged 0 to 21 years from 8 US children's hospitals. Participants were excluded if they developed HA-VTE prior to CVC insertion or if the CVC insertion date was unknown. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between clinical factors and CRT status. RESULTS: There were 1144 participants with HA-VTE who had a CVC. CRT developed in 833 participants, and 311 developed non-CRT. Multivariable analysis showed increased odds of CRT (compared with non-CRT) in participants with peripherally inserted central catheters (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 2.04-7.10; p < .001), CVCs inserted in the femoral vein (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.70-11.65; p = .002), multiple CVCs (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71; p < .001), and CVC malfunction (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.80-6.03; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide new insights on risk factor differences between CRT and non-CRT. Prevention efforts should be directed at modifying the type of CVC, insertion location, and/or number of CVCs placed, if possible, to decrease the incidence of CRT.

Efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors (ATLAS-INH): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Fitusiran, a subcutaneous investigational small interfering RNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin to rebalance haemostasis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B, irrespective of inhibitor status. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study was done at 26 sites (primarily secondary or tertiary centres) in 12 countries. Men, boys, and young adults aged 12 years or older with severe haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors previously treated with on-demand bypassing agents were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive once-a-month 80 mg subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis (fitusiran prophylaxis group) or to continue with bypassing agents on-demand (bypassing agents on-demand group) for 9 months. The primary endpoint was mean annualised bleeding rate during the efficacy period in the intention-to-treat population estimated by negative binomial model. Safety was assessed as a secondary endpoint in the safety population. This trial is complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03417102. FINDINGS: Between Feb 14, 2018, and June 23, 2021, 85 participants were screened for inclusion, of whom 57 (67%; 57 [100%] men; median age 27·0 years [IQR 19·5-33·5]) were randomly assigned: 19 (33%) participants to the bypassing agent on-demand group and 38 (67%) participants to the fitusiran prophylaxis. Negative binomial model-based mean annualised bleeding rate was significantly lower in the fitusiran prophylaxis group (1·7 [95% CI 1·0-2·7]) than in the bypassing agents on-demand group (18·1 [10·6-30·8]), corresponding to a 90·8% (95% CI 80·8-95·6) reduction in annualised bleeding rate in favour of fitusiran prophylaxis (p<0·0001). 25 (66%) participants had zero treated bleeds in the fitusiran prophylaxis group versus one (5%) in the bypassing agents on-demand group. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event in the fitusiran prophylaxis group was increased alanine aminotransferase in 13 (32%) of 41 participants in the safety population; there were no increased alanine aminotransferase treatment-emergent adverse events in the bypassing agents on-demand group. Suspected or confirmed thromboembolic events were reported in two (5%) participants in the fitusiran prophylaxis group. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis resulted in statistically significant reductions in annualised bleeding rate in participants with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors, with two-thirds of participants having zero bleeds. Fitusiran prophylaxis might show haemostatic efficacy in participants with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors; therefore, the therapeutic might have the potential to improve the management of people with haemophilia. FUNDING: Sanofi.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: facilitating research through infrastructure, workforce, resources and funding.

BACKGROUND: The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) conducted extensive, inclusive community consultations to guide prioritization of research in coming decades in alignment with its mission to find cures and address and prevent complications enabling people and families with blood disorders to thrive. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: With the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network, NHF recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill the community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk. WG6 was charged with identifying the infrastructure, workforce development, and funding and resources to facilitate the prioritized research. Community input on conclusions was gathered at the NHF State of the Science Research Summit. RESULTS: WG6 detailed a minimal research capacity infrastructure threshold, and opportunities to enable its attainment, for bleeding disorders centers to participate in prospective, multicenter national registries. They identified challenges and opportunities to recruit, retain, and train the diverse multidisciplinary care and research workforce required into the future. Innovative collaborative approaches to trial design, resource networking, and funding to surmount obstacles facing research in rare disorders were elucidated. CONCLUSIONS: The innovations in infrastructure, workforce development, and resources and funding proposed herein may contribute to facilitating a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders.

Research is critical to advancing the diagnosis and care of people with inherited bleeding disorders (PWIBD). This research requires significant infrastructure, including people and resources. Hemophilia treatment centers (HTC) need many different skilled care professionals including doctors, nurses, and other providers; also statisticians, data managers, and other experts to process patients' clinical information into research. Attracting diverse qualified professionals to the clinical and research work requires long-term planning, recruiting individuals in training programs and retaining them as they become experts. Research infrastructure includes physical servers running database software, networks that link them, and the environment in which these components function. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) coordinate and fund data collection at HTCs on the health and well-being of thousands of PWIBD into a registry used in research studies.National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and ATHN asked our group of health care professionals, technology experts, and lived experience experts (LEE) to identify the infrastructure, workforce, and resources needed to do the research most important to PWIBD. We identified the types of CDC/ATHN studies all HTCs should be able to perform, and the physical and human infrastructure this requires. We prioritized finding the best clinical trial designs to study inherited bleeding disorders, identifying ways to share personnel and tools between HTCs, and innovating how research is governed and funded. Involving LEEs in designing, managing, and carrying out research will be key in conducting research to improve the lives of PWIBD.